Change of Tone from House GOP on Replacing ObamaCare

Just days to go before a Thursday vote on the House GOP bill, moderate Republicans have already expressed deep reservations about making drastic reforms to the current health care system. “There’s … a particularly strong belief among House GOP leaders that if Trump puts his full force behind the legislation, these Freedom Caucus members will buckle”, WaPo notes, undoubtedly correctly.

The cuts to Medicaid would coincide with a surge in the number of seniors around the county and the country, said Anne Montgomery, the deputy director of the Center for Elder Care and Advanced Illness at the Altarum Institute, a nonprofit organization that researches health systems.

“We’re a yes. We’re excited to be there, ” said Rep. Mark Walker, R-N.C., leader of the Republican Study Committee, a large group of conservatives.

Earlier this year, Snyder and other Republican governors had praised members of Congress and the Trump administration for meeting with them to consider their concerns that whatever a replacement for Obamacare looked like, it needed to give them the resources and flexibility needed to continue to insure low-income individuals and families in their states that got coverage under the program. But negative reaction to the GOP plan is proving that the more important promise, frequently repeated by President Trump, is to provide coverage to all.

President Trump says he changed some minds on the House GOP bill to replace ObamaCare. An additional 9 million people in Medicaid’s traditional eligibility categories, including adults, children, and disabled individuals, would be uninsured. “We want the government to enhance that, to flourish that, not to stymie it”.

And even though almost half of the pregnancies in the United States are unplanned, women would have to purchase this maternity coverage months in advance of being pregnant ― otherwise it could be considered a pre-existing condition for which insurance companies could deny coverage. Average subsidies under the bill would be below what’s available under current law, and they would grow more slowly, too, amounting by 2026 to about 50 percent of what is now available. “We’re going to have a health care plan that’s going to be second to none”.

Hoping to secure support, Trump was meeting with a group of House conservatives at the Oval Office.

“On balance and with the changes we agreed to in the bill’s final text, I can vote for it”, Walker said in a statement afterward.

“We made certain changes but frankly very little.”

Back at the Capitol, Walker told reporters that eight members of their steering committee that had been a “no” or “undecided” are now a “yes” because of the changes.

“They won’t have the votes unless they change it” further, said Meadows, who leads the House Freedom Caucus.

I also depend on Medicaid for my health insurance and long-term supports funded by the IRIS program. Friday’s meeting did not cover that possibility, Scalise said. It’s a courtship by the White House, and it’s working.

Critics say it would make health insurance more expensive for individuals, especially older adults and those with modest incomes.

(Walker) “Returns power to the state to be able to make the best decision for the sick, the indigent”.

The RSC chairman’s endorsement is good news for the House leadership and the White House.

My congressman is one of the many in Congress who avoid public town halls like the plague, yet many are adept at social media, posting misleading memes like the one I’ve discussed here. A significant number of Republicans – including Rep.

Under a block grant, states would receive a fixed amount of federal funding each year, regardless of how many participants are in the program.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *